To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video. You can view this on the NLA website.
Login Register. Advanced search Search history. Browse titles authors subjects uniform titles series callnumbers dewey numbers starting from optional. See what's been added to the collection in the current 1 2 3 4 5 6 weeks months years. Your reader barcode: Your last name:. Cite this Email this Add to favourites Print this page.
You must be logged in to Tag Records. She is professor of English literature and creative writing at Brandeis University. Wonders and the Order of Nature, — , which she coauthored with Katharine Park , was awarded the Pfizer Prize as well. Arnold I. Davidson , executive editor of Critical Inquiry , is professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago and teaches regularly at the University of Pisa. A fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a recipient of the Toynbee Prize in social science, she is Henry Charles Lea Professor Emerita of History at Princeton University and, currently, adjunct professor of history, anthropology, medieval studies, and comparative literature at the University of Toronto.
He is professor emeritus of Slavic and comparative literature at Stanford University and professor emeritus of comparative literature at Princeton University. Kenneth J. His article "Social Psychology Thus, a parasite attaches to a host at 18 degrees. How the host feels to the parasite is that it is 18 degrees. The quale of the feel of 18 degrees, then, need not be subjective at all but can refer to the objective order.
But obviously if the notion of object is more unclear, the argument for a seemingly more secure account of subjective experience fails. Precisely those elements so despised by anti-representationalists are those non-epistemic elements that are owed, not to veridical engagement with physical objects, but those gaps and break-downs which constitute perceptual feel experience. Inner sensations like pains , memory-images and thoughts like desires, hopes and plans and dream-states are distinct mental operations, but share certain phenomenological characteristics.
Unlike "outer" sensations, these lack 1 contours, 2 a specific location, and 3 being set off from a background; that is, qualities of definiteness. They also lack qualities of coherence. Thus in our experience we expect acceptable transitions spatio-temporal continuity whereas dreams usually lack this quality. Interestingly, gaps contribute substantially to the experience of subjectivity. This was pointed out by Duncker , who noted that, "the phenomenon of an objectivity which persists unchanged.
One of the most fundamental representations is what belongs to me and what belongs to not-me. These phenomenally available intentional contents are indeed qualia but contrary to Gibson, Shepherd, Dennett and the enactive group, they have a mode of reality and determinate properties that can and should be investigated. This is related in a complex way to the outer world. On one hand, some Italian researchers emphasize that their investigations search out all phenomenal properties and their relationships, suggesting qualia-mania.
On the other hand, we are told that this phenomenal world just is what we have available to us, our only reality. This is ambiguous as to the relation to the outer world. In other words, Brentanist descriptive psychology is a true qualia engine. The intent to separate experimental phenomenology from brain research improves the purity of the descriptive project.
But if the critical realist epistemology that is sketched here is respected and which Brentano also took for granted; Albertazzi, separating experience from both a transcendent world and transcendent brain events, then experimental phenomenology would remain agnostic to both the brain and reality. Inference cannot be made to the real world. To summarize, qualia have a metaphysical basis even if they are not physical items. Furthermore, their description is an important part of descriptive epistemology.
Finally, their exhaustive description — without prejudice of any kind of constancy hypothesis or stimulus error — is necessary for adequate psychophysical investigation. Perceptual Richness Demands Representation The previous discussion shows that sensorimotor coordination leaves much left out from a phenomenology of perception and that a minimal definition of mental representation as intentional qualia is required both to do justice to the phenomena but also for a productive inventory of it in terms of experimental phenomena.
Gaps and breaks in experience can make it unclear just what is an object of perception. Adding to this equation the environment and the variability of affordances, social relations, and momentary states like emotion, representations are vital. Gestalt theory already dealt with this advance of representational epistemology and therefore it must be dealt with.
Minding the Gap: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science in the Two Traditions [ Christopher Norris] on rinphapaserdo.ml *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Reviews the book, Minding the gap: Epistemology and philosophy of science in the two traditions by Christopher Norris (). In this book, the author takes.
As will become clear, this makes things harder for the enactive approach. The crux of the enactive approach is that dependencies — tracking of an object — are sufficient to manage absorbed action and that representation is not necessary. Although gestalt relational determinism could explain the same elements, they could also give explanations for laboratory phenomenon that Gibson shunned, those non-epistemic elements making up experience that do not have survival value but are real qualia nevertheless.
It includes a phenomenal representation of both the bodily ego as well as goals. Immobilized vision reveals illusions but so do sensorimotor dependencies. Thus there is strong evidence that voluntary movements are coded in a common representational medium as are perceptions Prinz, This common code not only guides but also controls movements. Overriding any number of intended actions are gestalt factors, simplicity, symmetry and the like which train actions into more regular and non-epistemic patterns.
It tells you what the mind-body connection is not, but does not offer any positive answers. To make this point, we may ask: where do sensorimotor dependencies come from?
How do we get into the Porsche in the first place? We can be absorbed in a chess or tennis game.
But we need some theory of dependencies for extended actions. If we lazily miss a point in tennis or lapse in judgment in chess, we hold fast to our image of ourselves that is of a player for whom such lapses are unacceptable. Thus, even in non-deliberative coping, a simple engagement with an object is insufficient for describing the look and feel of experience. This is drawn out in an example from Jeffrey Scarborough In executing my basketball shot, for instance, I feel that I am going unusually hard to the basket and must be careful to put the ball up softly; or as the tall defender steps forward to block me, it is not just my body that is aware of the need to put additional arc on the shot.
Punti d'incontro passati e presenti Firenze, Le Lettere, control only at a very gross level that recedes with practice.
There is much more going on in phenomenal perceptual experience than this slogan allows The psychologist Mechsner , a proponent of the dual coding representational approach to movements, concurs. Swing can thus be perceived. Performance can be adjusted by way of adjusting the corresponding perceptual quality of the swing. To sum up, swing is not only a physical but also a phenomenological quality. The point is that there are rich qualia supporting our interaction of the world. To the degree that such states involve abstraction, and container-concepts, they need to be theorized in a psychophysical sense as qualia, because they go beyond a simple response-dependence relationship.
The hesitancy to avoid terms relating to representations can be seen in an allied from ethics. Dreyfus Dreyfus and Dreyfus, reviewed Mandelbaum's phenomenological account of moral judgments and was disappointed by his application of "unwilled" only to trivial aspects of experience like "I see a child in danger and catch hold of its hand; I hear a crash and become alert to help" p. According to Dreyfus, however, much more of ethical life and motivated action in general could be portrayed into the realm of the unwilled.
However, in the work discussed by Dreyfus, The Phenomenology of Moral Experience, Mandelbaum forestalled this criticism when he wrote a paragraph that deserves to be quoted at length: the term 'judgment' as here used must be construed in a loose manner, for in speaking of a direct moral judgment, I do not mean to imply that inference is involved. One immediately 'sees' -- or so one believes -- the rightness or wrongness of that which is contemplated.
It might therefore seem preferable to speak of a 'direct moral awareness' or a 'direct moral insight. In default of a better term I therefore prefer to use the work 'judgment' in an admittedly loose sense" p.
Once these cognitive and of course representational elements get more and more complicated, the very idea of what constitutes an object to be tracked by dependence become troublesome. The Gibsonian physical affordances are not so clear any longer, and change based on motivation Tomasello, This last discussion has had to keep separate distal object, proximal stimulation and phenomenal experience — a discrete mental geography. It serves to underscore once again the conflationary nature of the enactivist discussion. Isomorphism The richness of representational content in experience begs the question of an adequate physical system that could make it possible.
The enactive approach is full of discussions of the biology of vision yet it shuns a central role for any kind of reifying function for brain representations.
Here, the discussion shifts to isomorphism and a slight difference in emphasis by one of the members of the enactive group, Evan Thompson. Although he shares the enactive agenda he has been more open — through his collaboration with Francisco Varela — to investigating available brain models. It is no coincidence that he is also the most open of the group to brain modeling albeit in an epiphenomenal way. The non-epistemic, more-than-just-practical-interface with the environment, reveals signatures of underlying neural mechanisms.